First Diagnostic Test for Long Covid, Detecting Spike Protein in Blood, to Launch in September. Or is it ‘Long Vaccine’?


The first diagnostic designed to identify patients with Long Covid has received CE-IVD marking in Europe, meaning it is ready for its formal launch in countries accepting the designation this month. It works by looking for “patterns of inflammatory marker expression” in the blood, and in particular for the Covid spike protein persisting in white blood cells. Business Wire has the story.

The simple blood test can help to objectively diagnose patients suffering from Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC), commonly known as Long Covid. Developed by IncellDx, the test will be available to prescribers and patients in September through one of the world’s largest providers of diagnostic services.

A CE Mark indicates that the incellKINE Long Covid In Vitro Diagnostic fulfills the requirements of relevant European product directives and meets all the requirements of the relevant recognised European harmonised performance and safety standards…

The CE marking is supported by data from a validation study conducted by one of the world’s largest providers of diagnostic services, showing the test provides greater than 90% accuracy across Covid strains. The test was developed based on clinical studies published in the peer reviewed journal Frontiers in Immunology, which showed that IncellDx researchers generated credible, objective disease scores for Long Covid using machine learning and artificial intelligence to measure and analyse sets of inflammatory markers called cytokines and chemokines. The studies also demonstrated that patients with previous COVID-19 infection and lingering symptoms were found to have a distinct immunologic profile characterised by patterns of inflammatory marker expression. In a subsequent publication, IncellDx found SARS CoV-2 S1 spike protein in monocytic reservoirs of Long Covid patients up to 15 months after acute infection. These papers can be found here and here.

Patterson added, “Long Covid presents a significant diagnostic and treatment challenge for patients. Many of the symptoms that are associated with long Covid, including fatigue, brain fog, shortness of breath, insomnia, and a wide range of cardiovascular issues, can easily be mistaken for other conditions like post-Lyme, ME-CFS, Fibromyalgia, or even the common cold. Having an effective – and importantly an objective – tool to diagnose the condition is absolutely essential. An objective test that can detect immune signatures specific to Long Covid is vital for effective diagnosis and to enable patients to seek effective treatment.”

Patients who have or think they may have Long Covid can learn more and register for a test here.

One question is how it will distinguish Long Covid from ‘Long Vaccine’. The same research team behind this test also investigated whether vaccination produced a similar syndrome characterised by lingering spike protein, immune inflammation and the typical symptoms. They found it did: spike protein persistence from vaccination appeared, they said, to be a “major contributor” of symptoms similar to Long Covid post-vaccination. Further, given that the spike protein “alone delivered by vaccination can cause similar pathologic features”, they concluded it may be a “major contributor” of Long Covid symptoms post-infection as well. In other words, Long Covid after infection may be being caused or prolonged by spike protein from the vaccine rather than the infection. It’s not clear if the new diagnostic test will distinguish between these causes (or if that’s possible).

Some people test positive for Covid-19 for weeks. Are they still infectious?

Authors: Advisory Board June 1, 2022

After contracting Covid-19, some people may continue to test positive on rapid tests for 10 days or longer—and experts are split about whether these individuals should continue to isolate past 10 days or just employ safety precautions until they test negative.

How long can people test positive with omicron?

According to the New York Times, the omicron variant of the coronavirus moves quickly, with viral levels typically peaking less than five days after the virus is first detectable. However, some people will continue to test positive for the virus even up to 14 days later.

For example, a new analysis, which has not yet been peer-reviewed, found that roughly 20% people who were repeatedly tested during the omicron wave still tested positive on rapid tests 11 days after they first became symptomatic or initially tested positive.

“For some people, they’re seeing fairly prolonged courses of being antigen-positive,” said Yonatan Grad, an immunologist and infectious disease expert at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. “I think we chalk it up to some variation in people’s immune system and ability to respond to infection and clear this virus.”

However, a positive test may not always mean that an individual is still infectious. “Some people may not be infectious at the end of their course even if still antigen-positive, whereas others may be infectious even if antigen-negative,” Grad said.

According to research from Amy Barczak, an infectious disease expert at Massachusetts General Hospital, and her team, some people have tested positive even though they did not have positive viral cultures, which indicate infectious virus. This suggests that tests are detecting lingering viral remnants rather than any infectious virus.

What should you do if you keep testing positive?

According to CDC‘s current Covid-19 isolation guidance, people can end their isolation after five days if they no longer have a fever and their other symptoms have improved. However, if symptoms continue, it recommended that people isolate until their symptoms subside and wear a mask through day 10.

Currently, CDC does not require people to test negative before they end their isolation. For people who do choose to test themselves, the agency recommends people who test positive to isolate until day 10, while those who test negative can end their isolation but should wear a mask until day 10.

However, there is no clear consensus about whether people should continue to isolate past 10 days if they are still testing positive.

Michael Mina, an epidemiologist and chief science officer at eMed, said people who test positive should assume they are infectious, which will allow them to adjust their behavior and be more careful around others to avoid spreading the virus.

Separately, Aubree Gordon, an infectious disease epidemiologist at the University of Michigan School of Public Health, agreed with Mina’s assessment. “They’re probably less contagious than they were in the first few days,” she said. “But I would still certainly advise some caution.”

While some health experts recommend people isolate until they test negative, others argue that it doesn’t make sense to ask people who are otherwise healthy to isolate or test past 10 days.

“Nobody’s saying that there aren’t some people, maybe statistically speaking at the end of the tail, who might transmit after Day 10,” said Peter Chin-Hong, an infectious disease specialist at the University of California, San Francisco. However, people at this stage are not likely to play a large role in viral transmission, and continued testing could keep many people out of school or work.

“And also you raise an equity issue,” Chin-Hong added, “like ‘Who on Earth can have enough tests?'”

In addition, Mina noted that there are other ways to reduce viral spread than just isolating, including choosing not to visit vulnerable family members or attend crowded public areas, including churches and bar, until you test negative. 

“It’s not just isolating, and never has been,” Mina said. “It’s all the little things you can do to prevent infecting someone else, even without isolating.”

Two New Studies Offer a First Model for Diagnosing, Monitoring and Treating Long COVID

Two new studies propose the first model for diagnosing, indexing and monitoring Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC), also known as long COVID or long haul COVID. The findings also provide a framework for understanding the cause of, and potential treatment for, long COVID. Long COVID is believed to affect as many as 30 percent of people who have recovered from initial infection with COVID-19.

“In these studies, we used machine learning to determine that long haulers have a distinct immunologic profile suggesting a high degree of vascular inflammation, which we were then able to develop into an index for objectively diagnosing and monitoring the progress of PASC patients”Tweet this

In the study Persistence of SARS CoV-2 S1 Protein in CD16+ Monocytes in Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) Up to 15 Months Post-Infection conducted by IncellDx and available at bioRxiv, patients with previous COVID infection and lingering symptoms were found to have a distinct immunologic profile characterized by differentiated proportions of monocyte subsets. In the study, the presence of SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein was investigated in 46 people. T-cell, B-cell, and monocytic subsets were analyzed in both severe COVID-19 patients and in patients with post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC). The levels of both intermediate (CD14+, CD16+) and non-classical monocyte (CD14Lo, CD16+) were significantly increased compared with healthy controls. Neither monocyte subset was elevated in cases of severe COVID-19. Additionally, the SARS-CoV-2 protein subunit S1 was present in non-classical monocytes among patients thought to have PASC for up to 16 months following initial infection. Monocytes, a type of white blood cell, are involved in adaptive immunity and are instrumental in attacking viruses and other pathogens.

In the study Immune-Based Prediction of COVID-19 Severity and Chronicity Decoded Using Machine Learning, available in Frontiers in Immunology, 224 individuals, including healthy controls and patients spanning the COVID-19 disease continuum, were assessed using machine learning for severity and chronic symptoms following initial infection. CCL5/RANTES, IL-2, IL-4, CCL3, IL-6, IL-10, IFN-γ, and VEGF were all significantly elevated in long COVID patients compared to healthy controls (P<0.001), while GM-CSF and CCL4 were in significantly lower levels than healthy controls (P=0.01). Data were analyzed to generate objective disease scores for PASC and severe COVID patients.

“In these studies, we used machine learning to determine that long haulers have a distinct immunologic profile suggesting a high degree of vascular inflammation, which we were then able to develop into an index for objectively diagnosing and monitoring the progress of PASC patients,” said Bruce Patterson, MD, CEO of IncellDx. “The data also suggests a model for understanding the possible cause of PASC. We found SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein in non-classical monocytes, which we know travel all around the body including through the blood brain barrier, and are mobilized during exercise, which may explain why almost every long hauler has exercise intolerance. These cells are bound by what’s called the fractalkine receptor and CCR5 and patrol and ultimately cause inflammation of the cells lining blood vessels all around the body. By blocking the CCL5/CCR5 pathway and the fractalkine/fractalkine receptor pathways, we may have an approach to treat the cause of PASC rather than the symptoms.”

“Taken together, findings from these two studies provide an objective and measurable model for understanding what’s happening and why long COVID patients continue to experience symptoms long after initial COVID infection, and why those symptoms are so diverse and widespread. Together with an objective method to diagnosis and monitor patients, we can assess potential therapeutic targets to reduce the survival of S1-containing non-classical monocytes and the associated vascular inflammation, and we now have a much better roadmap for managing patients and deploying effective treatment paradigms. At IncellDx, we’re working to target these pathways therapeutically. We have filed patents to cover the targeting of the CCL5/CCR5 and fractalkine pathways in PASC,” said Dr. Patterson.

Use of DAMPs and SAMPs as Therapeutic Targets or Therapeutics: A Note of Caution

  • 2020 Jun;24(3):251-262. doi: 10.1007/s40291-020-00460-z.

Walter Gottlieb Land 1 2 PMID: 32248387

PMCID: PMC7127836

DOI: 10.1007/s40291-020-00460-z

Free PMC article


This opinion article discusses the increasing attention paid to the role of activating damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) in initiation of inflammatory diseases and suppressing/inhibiting DAMPs (SAMPs) in resolution of inflammatory diseases and, consequently, to the future roles of these novel biomarkers as therapeutic targets and therapeutics. Since controlled production of DAMPs and SAMPs is needed to achieve full homeostatic restoration and repair from tissue injury, only their pathological, not their homeostatic, concentrations should be therapeutically tackled. Therefore, distinct caveats are proposed regarding choosing DAMPs and SAMPs for therapeutic purposes. For example, we discuss the need to a priori identify and define a context-dependent “homeostatic DAMP:SAMP ratio” in each case and a “homeostatic window” of DAMP and SAMP concentrations to guarantee a safe treatment modality to patients. Finally, a few clinical examples of how DAMPs and SAMPs might be used as therapeutic targets or therapeutics in the future are discussed, including inhibition of DAMPs in hyperinflammatory processes (e.g., systemic inflammatory response syndrome, as currently observed in Covid-19), administration of SAMPs in chronic inflammatory diseases, inhibition of SAMPs in hyper-resolving processes (e.g., compensatory anti-inflammatory response syndrome), and administration/induction of DAMPs in vaccination procedures and anti-cancer therapy.

For More Information:

Role of DAMPs in respiratory virus-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome—with a preliminary reference to SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia

Authors: Walter Gottlieb Land Genes & Immunity volume 22, pages141–160 (2021 )Cite this article


When surveying the current literature on COVID-19, the “cytokine storm” is considered to be pathogenetically involved in its severe outcomes such as acute respiratory distress syndrome, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and eventually multiple organ failure. In this review, the similar role of DAMPs is addressed, that is, of those molecules, which operate upstream of the inflammatory pathway by activating those cells, which ultimately release the cytokines. Given the still limited reports on their role in COVID-19, the emerging topic is extended to respiratory viral infections with focus on influenza. At first, a brief introduction is given on the function of various classes of activating DAMPs and counterbalancing suppressing DAMPs (SAMPs) in initiating controlled inflammation-promoting and inflammation-resolving defense responses upon infectious and sterile insults. It is stressed that the excessive emission of DAMPs upon severe injury uncovers their fateful property in triggering dysregulated life-threatening hyperinflammatory responses. Such a scenario may happen when the viral load is too high, for example, in the respiratory tract, “forcing” many virus-infected host cells to decide to commit “suicidal” regulated cell death (e.g., necroptosis, pyroptosis) associated with release of large amounts of DAMPs: an important topic of this review. Ironically, although the aim of this “suicidal” cell death is to save and restore organismal homeostasis, the intrinsic release of excessive amounts of DAMPs leads to those dysregulated hyperinflammatory responses—as typically involved in the pathogenesis of acute respiratory distress syndrome and systemic inflammatory response syndrome in respiratory viral infections. Consequently, as briefly outlined in this review, these molecules can be considered valuable diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers to monitor and evaluate the course of the viral disorder, in particular, to grasp the eventual transition precociously from a controlled defense response as observed in mild/moderate cases to a dysregulated life-threatening hyperinflammatory response as seen, for example, in severe/fatal COVID-19. Moreover, the pathogenetic involvement of these molecules qualifies them as relevant future therapeutic targets to prevent severe/ fatal outcomes. Finally, a theory is presented proposing that the superimposition of coronavirus-induced DAMPs with non-virus-induced DAMPs from other origins such as air pollution or high age may contribute to severe and fatal courses of coronavirus pneumonia.


When the first articles on severe and fatal outcomes of COVID-19 were published, researchers worldwide working in the field of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) thought spontaneously: this is the work of DAMPs! And the researchers were surprised that most authors focused on the pathogenetic role of the “cytokine storm” observed in patients developing viral pneumonia-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) without discussing the fundamental part of DAMPs in initiating cytokine production. However, quite admittedly, the dataset on the pathogenetic role of DAMPs in COVID-19 is still too poor to prove their vital pathogenetic role in this challenging disease. On the other hand, there is accumulating evidence indicating that DAMPs are involved in respiratory viral disorders (as in all infectious diseases), culminating in three recent reports on their detection in COVID-19 patients [1,2,3]. This should be reason enough for a short review.

DAMPs in infectious diseases at a glance

The danger/injury model in Immunology, proposed in 1994 [45] and after that several times modified, argues that immune responses are driven by cell stress and tissue injury, including pathogen-caused stress and injury, rather than by the recognition of non-self molecules derived, for example, from pathogenic invaders. The core of this model refers to the generation and emission of DAMPs, that is, molecules that are generated, exposed, or emitted upon any stress, damage, or death of cells.

For More Information:

Evolution of NETosis markers and DAMPs have prognostic value in critically ill COVID-19 patients

  1. Authors: Joram HuckriedeSara Bülow AnderbergAlbert MoralesFemke de VriesMichael HultströmAnders BergqvistJosé T. Ortiz-PérezJan Willem SelsKanin WichapongMiklos LipcseyMarcel van de PollAnders LarssonTomas LutherChris ReutelingspergerPablo Garcia de FrutosRobert Frithiof & Gerry A. F. Nicolaes  Scientific Reports volume 11, Article number: 15701 (2021) Cite this article


Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) presents with disease severities of varying degree. In its most severe form, infection may lead to respiratory failure and multi-organ dysfunction. Here we study the levels and evolution of the damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPS) cell free DNA (cfDNA), extracellular histone H3 (H3) and neutrophil elastase (NE), and the immune modulators GAS6 and AXL in relation to clinical parameters, ICU scoring systems and mortality in patients (n = 100) with severe COVID-19. cfDNA, H3, NE, GAS6 and AXL were increased in COVID-19 patients compared to controls. These measures associated with occurrence of clinical events and intensive care unit acquired weakness (ICUAW). cfDNA and GAS6 decreased in time in patients surviving to 30 days post ICU admission. A decrease of 27.2 ng/mL cfDNA during ICU stay associated with patient survival, whereas levels of GAS6 decreasing more than 4.0 ng/mL associated with survival. The presence of H3 in plasma was a common feature of COVID-19 patients, detected in 38% of the patients at ICU admission. NETosis markers cfDNA, H3 and NE correlated well with parameters of tissue damage and neutrophil counts. Furthermore, cfDNA correlated with lowest p/f ratio and a lowering in cfDNA was observed in patients with ventilator-free days.


In severe cases, COVID-19 disease develops into acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), an acute lung injury causing patients to be dependent of ventilator support, which may be accompanied by development of multiple organ failure (MOF)1. Mortality is seen primarily in patients over the age of 652,3,4,5 and is highest for infected individuals with underlying comorbidities such as hypertension, cardiovascular disease or diabetes6,7,8. For patients who are taken into the intensive care unit (ICU), a high SOFA (sequential organ failure assessment) score and increased levels of fibrin D-dimers have been reported9 to associate with poor prognosis. Thromboembolic complications develop in 35–45% of COVID-19 patients10, including thrombotic microangiopathies and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) reminiscent of bacterial sepsis. Yet, COVID-19 has distinct features11 that point at a somewhat different pathological mechanism. The involvement of immune regulatory and hemostatic pathways appears evident, and recent findings have confirmed that the innate immune system and more in particular neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) play a role in COVID-19 disease pathogenesis. NETs, networks of DNA fibers that are decorated with proteins such as histones and elastase, are released from neutrophils to bind and neutralize viral proteins, bacteria and fungi12. While extracellular histones and NE serve a protective, antimicrobial function, they are potentially harmful to the host.

NETs are abundant in lung capillaries13 and are known to be pro-coagulant due to their intrinsic capacity to activate platelets14.

Excessive NET production, initiated by several pathways that also include complement activation13, results in collateral damage to lung tissues, a disturbed microcirculation of the lung15, loss of alveolar-capillary barrier function and further release of pro-inflammatory cytokines16.

During the preparation of this work it was reported that cellular components that are released upon cellular disruption, so-called damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and NETosis are involved in COVID-19 disease1718. This is fully in line with the observation that in ARDS, NETs contribute to disease progress19. Extracellular histones are cytotoxic DAMPs irrespective of their origin. They may appear during NETosis12,14,20 or originate from damaged tissues21, while cell free DNA (cfDNA) and the protease neutrophil elastase (NE) are released concomitantly22. Cellular free deoxyribonucleic acid (cfDNA) and histones promote proinflammatory cytokine release23,24. Histones have been shown to activate and recruit leukocytes25, damage alveolar macrophages26, activate erythrocytes27, epithelial and endothelial cells, in particular pulmonary endothelial cells28,29,30. If not cleared from circulation, cfDNA as well as histones facilitate severe systemic inflammation and worsen the clinical condition31,32. Presence of NE in plasma is associated with exacerbations, lung function decline and disease severity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), bronchiectasis and cystic fibrosis33,34,35 and decrease of NE levels in bronchiectasis patients improved lung function and airway inflammation36.

At the same time that it provides a first line of defense against infections, the innate immune system initiates self-control responses to prevent damage to the host. One mechanism involved in early immunomodulation is the growth arrest-specific 6 (GAS6)/TAM ligand/receptor system37,38. The GAS6/AXL axis regulates the immune response by modulating cytokine production, inducing a reparative cellular response and by mediating efferocytosis, removing irreversibly damaged cells. The system also provides a mechanism of regulating endothelial and platelet activation and interaction39. Plasma concentrations of GAS6 and AXL increase in a diverse spectrum of inflammatory conditions40, including sepsis and septic shock; but also systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) without infection41. In several studies, GAS6 at IC admission correlated with severity of organ damage (i.e. SOFA) or with damage of specific organs41,42,43,44,45. This is also the case in viral infections46. These studies illustrate the modulatory role of the innate response provided by GAS6 and suggest that the presence of these components in plasma could be an early event in the orchestration of the immune response to viral infections.

cfDNA, extracellular histones and GAS6 are implicated in regulation of inflammatory and hemostatic pathways in the context of severe viral infections and ARDS, all of which are implicated in COVID-19. While other studies have reported the presence of DAMPs and NETosis markers in smaller COVID-19 populations, here we study a group of 100 severely ill COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Our hypothesis was twofold:

First, cfDNA, NE, histones and GAS6/AXL are activated in severe COVID-19. Second, cfDNA, NE, histones and GAS6/AXL are related to the severity of illness and reflect organ dysfunction in severe COVID-19.

For More Information:

Inflammasome activation at the crux of severe COVID-19

Authors: Setu M. Vora,1,2Judy Lieberman,2,3 and Hao Wu1,2


The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), results in life-threatening disease in a minority of patients, especially elderly people and those with co-morbidities such as obesity and diabetes. Severe disease is characterized by dysregulated cytokine release, pneumonia and acute lung injury, which can rapidly progress to acute respiratory distress syndrome, disseminated intravascular coagulation, multisystem failure and death. However, a mechanistic understanding of COVID-19 progression remains unclear. Here we review evidence that SARS-CoV-2 directly or indirectly activates inflammasomes, which are large multiprotein assemblies that are broadly responsive to pathogen-associated and stress-associated cellular insults, leading to secretion of the pleiotropic IL-1 family cytokines (IL-1β and IL-18), and pyroptosis, an inflammatory form of cell death. We further discuss potential mechanisms of inflammasome activation and clinical efforts currently under way to suppress inflammation to prevent or ameliorate severe COVID-19.


Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus responsible for COVID-19, has so far infected more than 190 million people and caused death of more than 4.1 million people worldwide. The virus primarily infects the respiratory tract, causing fever, sore throat, anosmia and dyspnoea, but its tissue tropism still remains to be fully understood. As many as 10–15% of patients develop severe pneumonia, with some cases progressing to hypoxia and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which requires mechanical ventilation in a critical care setting and has high mortality. Patients can also develop multi-organ failure, acute kidney injury and disseminated intravascular coagulation, among a host of other disorders111. Aside from supportive care, only a few treatments have been approved for COVID-19, and their reduction of mortality has been limited1214. Although several vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 have been approved and are being administered internationally, there will still be a significant number of infections owing to people who are not vaccinated in regions with inadequate access or acceptance of vaccination. In addition, while global vaccination efforts strive to meet the challenge of ending the pandemic, the appearance of immune-evasive viral variants and the unlikelihood of reaching immediate herd immunity underscore the continued need for additional treatments mitigating disease progression1519.

Most researchers agree that an inappropriate hyperinflammatory response lies at the root of many severe cases of COVID-19, driven by overexuberant inflammatory cytokine release. Consistently, co-morbidities, such as obesity, diabetes, heart disease, hypertension and ageing, which are prognostic of poor outcome, are associated with high basal inflammation7,11,20,21. It has been proposed since the beginning of the pandemic that these co-morbidities and the ensuing hyperinflammatory response may be aetiologically linked through overactive inflammasome signaling, which may account for the association of these co-morbidities with severe COVID-19 in the context of chronic inflammation as well as for COVID-19 progression in the context of a robust acute inflammatory response to infection2229. However, many of the studies that seek to understand the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 are based on RNA sequencing, often of thawed cells, and infected, activated or dying cells do not survive freeze–thaw well, which could skew results. Moreover, inflammasome activation does not directly induce transcriptional responses, and its detection is less straightforward than that of most other signaling pathways. Nonetheless, several studies are now accumulating that support direct (infection-induced) and indirect inflammasome activation and the critical role of inflammasomes in severe COVID-19. Here we discuss the available evidence, potential mechanisms and the implications for therapy.

Key to inflammation and innate immunity, are large, micrometer-scale multiprotein cytosolic complexes that assemble in response to pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) or damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and trigger proinflammatory cytokine release as well as pyroptosis, a proinflammatory lytic cell death30,31 (Fig. 1). Upon activation by PAMPs or DAMPs, canonical inflammasome sensors — mainly in monocytes, macrophages and barrier epithelial cells — oligomerize and recruit the adaptor apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a CARD (ASC) to form inflammasome specks, within which the inflammatory caspase 1 is recruited and activated. Inflammasome sensors are activated in response to different triggers and differ in their overall specificities to PAMPs or DAMPs. NLRP3, the most broadly activated inflammasome sensor and a member of the nucleotide-binding domain- and leucine-rich repeat-containing protein (NLR) family, responds to an array of insults to the cell that cause cytosolic K+ efflux, Ca2+ cytosolic influx or release of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS)31,32. These insults include extracellular ATP, membrane permeabilization by pore-forming toxins and large extracellular aggregates such as uric acid crystals, cholesterol crystals and amyloids30. Other sensors, such as AIM2 and NLRC4, are tuned to recognize specific PAMPs and DAMPs, such as cytosolic double-stranded DNA and bacterial proteins, respectively31. In a parallel pathway, the mouse inflammatory caspase 11 and human caspase 4 and caspase 5 sense PAMPs and DAMPs such as bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) that gain cytosolic access and endogenous oxidized phospholipids, leading directly to membrane damage or pyroptosis, and secondary K+ efflux followed by noncanonical NLRP3 inflammasome activation3336.

For More Information: